How to Prepare Technical Documentation for MDR Approval

Under MDR, technical documentation is the backbone of compliance. Without it, no medical device can be certified for the EU market. This guide explains how to prepare complete, audit-ready documentation that meets regulatory requirements.

Why Technical Documentation Matters

Technical documentation (often called the technical file) is the evidence regulators and notified bodies review to confirm that a device is safe, effective, and compliant. Missing or incomplete files are among the most common reasons for delayed MDR approvals.


Core Components of Technical Documentation

1. Device Description and Specifications

  • Define intended purpose, design, and operating principles.
  • Include variants, accessories, and compatibility information.

2. Risk Management File

  • Based on ISO 14971.
  • Identify hazards, risk evaluations, and mitigation measures.
  • Document residual risks and justifications.

3. Clinical Evaluation

  • Provide data on safety and performance.
  • Include clinical trials, literature reviews, and post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) plans.

4. Design and Manufacturing Information

  • Details on design process, materials used, and production methods.
  • Quality control and validation procedures.

5. Labeling and IFU (Instructions for Use)

  • Clear, compliant labeling in line with MDR requirements.
  • Multilingual IFUs where applicable.

6. Post-Market Surveillance (PMS) Plan

  • Outline how the device will be monitored after launch.
  • Link PMS to risk management and CAPA processes.

Best Practices for Building Documentation

  • Start Early: Don’t wait until the final stages of development.
  • Keep It Organized: Use a digital document management system.
  • Cross-Functional Approach: Involve engineering, clinical, and regulatory teams.
  • Update Regularly: Documentation is a living file, not a one-time task.
  • Audit-Ready Mindset: Always prepare as if a notified body will review tomorrow.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Incomplete or inconsistent data between sections.
  • Over-reliance on outdated clinical literature.
  • Failing to update documentation after design changes.
  • Lack of traceability between design, risks, and clinical evidence.

Conclusion

Preparing technical documentation for MDR approval can seem like a heavy task, but it’s also an opportunity to demonstrate the quality and reliability of your device.

By structuring documents carefully, involving the right experts, and maintaining a proactive approach, companies can achieve smoother approvals and long-term compliance in the EU market.